Part fiction, part literary criticism, the whole carried off with great brio. The result is a splendid hybrid of a novel, part biography, Rather, he has appropriately given us the story of an obsession with Flaubert. Barnes hasn't written this novel directly or simply. The correspondence seems to invite the creation of a supplementary novel with Flaubert, no longer shackled to his doctrine of ''impersonality'' inĪrt, as its hero. so different from the carefully controlled novels. To write ''a book about nothing'' - is so belied by what we know of the man and his rich inner life.īehind the magnificent and melancholy novels, as every lover of Flaubert knows, stands one of the richest and most entertaining of all correspondences: witty, iconoclastic, bracingly profane, unbuttoned and often explosive The temptation in fact seems hard to resist, since the austere image of Flaubert - the hermit of Croisset who sacrificed living to his unending quest for style, the father of modernism who wished most of all Outsized recreation of the writer's psychic life in ''The Family Idiot.'' Now Julian Barnes, a British novelist and journalist, has succumbed to the temptation to make Flaubert the central figure Ustave Flaubert has been the subject of a nearly obsessive number of biographies and critical studies, including Jean-Paul Sartre's MaObsessed With the Hermit of Croisset By PETER BROOKS
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |